Empirical versus preemptive antifungal therapy for high-risk, febrile, neutropenic patients: a randomized, controlled trial.

نویسندگان

  • Catherine Cordonnier
  • Cécile Pautas
  • Sébastien Maury
  • Anne Vekhoff
  • Hassan Farhat
  • Felipe Suarez
  • Nathalie Dhédin
  • Francoise Isnard
  • Lionel Ades
  • Frédérique Kuhnowski
  • Françoise Foulet
  • Mathieu Kuentz
  • Patrick Maison
  • Stéphane Bretagne
  • Michaël Schwarzinger
چکیده

BACKGROUND Empirical antifungal therapy is the standard of care for neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies who remain febrile despite broad-spectrum antibacterial treatment. Recent diagnostic improvements may ensure the early diagnosis of potentially invasive fungal disease. Reserving antifungals for this stage may achieve similar survival rates and reduce treatment toxicity and costs. METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial, we compared an empirical antifungal strategy with a preemptive one. Empirical treatment was defined as antibacterial treatment of patients who have persistent or recurrent fever. Preemptive treatment was defined as treatment of patients who have clinical, imaging, or galactomannan-antigen-assay evidence suggesting fungal disease. First-line antifungal treatment was amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 mg/kg/day) or liposomal amphotericin (3 mg/kg/day), depending on daily renal function. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients alive at 14 days after recovery from neutropenia. RESULTS The median duration of neutropenia (neutrophil count, <500 cells/mm3) for the 293 patients enrolled was 18 days (range, 5-69 days). By intention-to-treat analysis, survival was 97.3% with empirical treatment and 95.1% with preemptive treatment. The lower 95% confidence limit for the difference in mortality was -5.9%, which was within the noninferiority margin of -8%. Probable or proven invasive fungal infections were more common among patients who received preemptive treatment than among patients who received empirical treatment (13 of 143 vs. 4 of 150; P < .05), and most infections occurred during induction therapy (12 of 73 patients in the preemptive treatment group vs. 3 of 78 patients in the empirical treatment group were infected during induction therapy; P < .01). Preemptive treatment did not decrease nephrotoxicity but decreased costs of antifungal therapy by 35%. CONCLUSIONS Preemptive treatment increased the incidence of invasive fungal disease, without increasing mortality, and decreased the costs of antifungal drugs. Empirical treatment may provide better survival rates for patients receiving induction chemotherapy.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Preemptive Antifungal Therapy for Febrile Neutropenic Hematological Malignancy Patients in China

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency, adverse effects, and pharmacoeconomic impact of empirical and preemptive antifungal therapy for febrile neutropenic hematological malignancy patients in China. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with febrile neutropenia during hematological malignancy were randomly divided into an empirical group and a preemptive group. The preemptive ...

متن کامل

Liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients.

Liposomal amphotercin B was compared with conventional amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial. Using a composite end-point, the two drugs were equivalent in overall efficacy. However, the liposomal amphotericin B treatment group had fewer proven fungal infections, fewer infusion-related side effects and le...

متن کامل

Treatment of invasive candidiasis in neutropenic patients: systematic review of randomized controlled treatment trials.

Candidemia and invasive candidiasis (CIC) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, with a paucity of controlled data in neutropenic patients. A systematic review was conducted of available data for the treatment of CIC during neutropenia. A structured OVID search of multiple databases was performed. Data from randomized controlled trials of CIC and of empirical antifungal therap...

متن کامل

Evidence-based approach to treatment of febrile neutropenia in hematologic malignancies.

Applying the principles of evidence-based medicine to febrile neutropenia (FN) results in a more limited set of practices than expected. Hundreds of studies over the last 4 decades have produced evidence to support the following: (1) risk stratification allows the identification of a subset of patients who may be safely managed as outpatients given the right health care environment; (2) antibac...

متن کامل

Meta-Analysis and Cost Comparison of Empirical versus Pre-Emptive Antifungal Strategies in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with High-Risk Febrile Neutropenia

BACKGROUND Invasive fungal disease (IFD) causes significant morbidity and mortality in hematologic malignancy patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia (FN). These patients therefore often receive empirical antifungal therapy. Diagnostic test-guided pre-emptive antifungal therapy has been evaluated as an alternative treatment strategy in these patients. METHODS We conducted an electronic se...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

دوره 48 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009